KALU BANDA v. DAVID APPUHAMY
1963 Present: L. B. de Silva,
J., and Abeyesundere, J.
H. M. KALU BANDA and another, Appellants, and
S. K. B. A. D. DAVID APPUHAMY, Respondent
S.C. 274/1961-D. C. Kurunegala, 13,392/L
Res judicata-Same parties and subject
matter in two rei vindicatio actions-New title acquired by one party after the
decree in the earlier case-Validity-Civil Procedure Code, s. 207.
A decree entered in favour of the plaintiff in an action for declaration of
title to a divided portion of a land consisting of certain lots cannot operate
as res judicata in another similar action between the same parties in respect of
the same land but in respect of a different lot, title to which was acquired by
the defendant from a third party subsequent to the decree in the earlier action.
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court, Kurunegala.
C. R. Gunaratne for 1st and 2nd Defendants-Appellants.
T. B. Dissanayake, for Plaintiff-Respondent.
Cur. adv. vult.
October 22, 1963. L. B. DE SILVA, J.-
By decree (P3) dated 26/9/52 the plaintiff was declared entitled to a divided
portion of the land called Medawat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.