SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KALU BANDA v. DAVID APPUHAMY


Kalu Banda V. David Appuhamy

1963 Present: L. B. de Silva, J., and Abeyesundere, J.

H. M. KALU BANDA and another, Appellants, and
 S. K. B. A. D. DAVID APPUHAMY, Respondent

S.C. 274/1961-D. C. Kurunegala, 13,392/L

Res judicata-Same parties and subject matter in two rei vindicatio actions-New title acquired by one party after the decree in the earlier case-Validity-Civil Procedure Code, s. 207.

     A decree entered in favour of the plaintiff in an action for declaration of title to a divided portion of a land consisting of certain lots  cannot operate as res judicata in another similar action between the same parties in respect of the same land but in respect of a different lot, title to which was acquired by the defendant from a third party subsequent to the decree in the earlier action.

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court, Kurunegala.

                      C. R. Gunaratne for 1st and 2nd Defendants-Appellants.

                      T. B. Dissanayake, for Plaintiff-Respondent.

Cur. adv. vult.

October 22, 1963. L. B. DE SILVA, J.-

     By decree (P3) dated 26/9/52 the plaintiff was declared entitled to a divided portion of the land called Medawat











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top