SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KULATUNGE v. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CO OPERATIVE WHOLESALE ESTABLISHMENT


Kulatunge V. The Board Of Directors Of The Co Operative Wholesale Establishment

1963       Present: Sansoni, J., and H. N. G. Fernando, J.

L. KULATUNGE, Petitioner, and THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE CO-OPERATIVE WHOLESALE ESTABLISHMENT
and another, Respondents

S. C. 326/63-Application for a Mandate in the nature of a Writ of
Certiorari under Section 42 of the Courts Ordinance

Certiorari-Employer and employee-Appointments and dismissals-Dismissal of persons holding office at pleasure-Employee of a statutory body-Right of employer to terminate an employee's service without holding an inquiry- Natural justice-Principle of audi alteram partem-Co-operative Wholesale Establishment Act (Cap. 126), s. 11-Interpretation Ordinance, s. 14 (1).

    
Where a statutory body is merely given a power to dismiss a member of its staff, without any specification of the grounds of dismissal and/or of the procedure to be followed prior to dismissal, that body is not bound to act judicially in reaching its decision. In such a case, therefore, the dismissed employee is debarred from obtaining a writ of Certiorari.

      " The principle audi alteram partem must be observed in cases

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top