SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MUTHU RAMAIE v. ATHIMULAM


Muthu Ramaie V. Athimulam

1961 Present: Sansoni, J., and Tambiah, J.

MUTHU RAMAIE et al, Appellants, and ATHIMULAM et al.,
Respondents

S. C. 32/1960 (lnty.)-D. C. Kandy, 4851/P

Mortgage-Hypothecary action against two mortgagors-Death of one mortgagor before the action was filed-Validity of subsequent proceedings in the action-Mortgage Act, No. 6 of 1949, a. 26.

           
A mortgagee instituted a hypothecary action in respect of a land mortgaged to him by two co-mortgagors A and B. B had died prior to the date of action, but a representative of his estate was appointed in the mortgage action and added as a defendant.

  Held, that the death of co-mortgagor B prior to the institution of the mortgage action could not render the action a nullity. Accordingly, the subsequent mortgage decree and execution sale were valid. '

APPEAL from an order of the District Court, Kandy.

                   C. Ranganathan, with V. K. Palasuntheram, for the 3rd to 12th Defendants-Appellants.

                  Vernon Jonklaas, for the 13th Defendant-Respondent.

                  L. G. Weeramantry, with N. R. M. Daluwatte, for the Plaintiff-Respondent.

                 G.















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top