V. C. MAMMOO V. M. P. K. MENON
1964 Present: Basnayake, C.J., Abeyesundere,
J.,
and Sirimane, J.
V. C. MAMMOO
and 2 others, Appellants, and
M. P. K. MENON, Respondent
S. C. 65/61- C. R. Colombo, 76475
Landlord and tenant-Monthly tenancy-Action
for recovery of arrears of rent only- Subsequent action for
ejectment-Maintainability-Notice to quit-Effect of subsequent waiver, tacit or
otherwise-Res judicata-Civil Procedure Code, ss. 33, 34, 207.
(i) A landlord who, before the notice to quit sent
by him to his monthly tenant has taken effect, sues the tenant for recovery of
arrears of rent only, but not for ejectment, is entitled to bring a separate
action in ejectment after the same notice to quit has taken effect.
Plaintiffs had let certain premises to the defendant on a
monthly tenancy. On 2nd April 1960 notice of termination of the tenancy was
given requiring the defendant to deliver possession of the house by 31st May
1960. Before the expiry of the notice, however, namely on 26th May 1960, action
No. 50064 was instituted in the District Court for recovery of all arrears of
rent due up to that date. Consent decree was entered in that action on 2nd
Febru
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.