SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MEERUPPE SUMANATISSA TERUNNANSE v. WARAKAPITIYA SAGANANDA TERUNNANSE


Meeruppe Sumanatissa Terunnanse V. Warakapitiya Sangananda Terunnanse

1964 Present: T. S. Fernando, J., and Sri Skanda Rajah, J.

MEERUPPE  SUMANATISSA TERUNNANSE, Petitioner, and
 WARAKAPITIYA SANGANANDA TERUNNANSE, Respondent

S. C. 283/1963-Application for Conditional Leave to Appeal to
 Her Majesty in Council under the Appeals (Privy Council) Ordinance.

Privy Council-Application for conditional leave to appeal-Failure of petitioner to file affidavit-Effect-Affidavit-Form of jurat-Appeals (Privy Council) Ordinance, Schedule, Rules 1 (a), 2, 3-Civil Procedure Code, ss. 376, 439.

In an application for conditional leave to appeal to the Privy Council in terms of Rule 2 of the Schedule to the Appeals (Privy Council) Ordinance, the absence of an affidavit is not fatal to a grant of leave.

An affidavit filed by a person who is not able to understand writing in the English language is liable to be rejected if the jurat is not in the form required by section 439 of the Civil Procedure Code.

APPLICATION for conditional leave to appeal to the Privy Council.

                   H.  Wanigatunga, for the petitioner.

                  A. F. Wijemanne, for the respondent



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top