MEERUPPE SUMANATISSA TERUNNANSE v. WARAKAPITIYA SAGANANDA TERUNNANSE
1964 Present: T. S. Fernando,
J., and Sri Skanda Rajah, J.
MEERUPPE SUMANATISSA TERUNNANSE, Petitioner, and
WARAKAPITIYA SANGANANDA TERUNNANSE, Respondent
S. C. 283/1963-Application for Conditional Leave to Appeal to
Her Majesty in Council under the Appeals (Privy Council) Ordinance.
Privy Council-Application for conditional
leave to appeal-Failure of petitioner to file affidavit-Effect-Affidavit-Form of
jurat-Appeals (Privy Council) Ordinance, Schedule, Rules 1 (a), 2, 3-Civil
Procedure Code, ss. 376, 439.
In an application for conditional leave to appeal to the Privy Council in terms
of Rule 2 of the Schedule to the Appeals (Privy Council) Ordinance, the absence
of an affidavit is not fatal to a grant of leave.
An affidavit filed by a person who is not able to understand writing in the
English language is liable to be rejected if the jurat is not in the form
required by section 439 of the Civil Procedure Code.
APPLICATION for conditional leave to appeal to the Privy Council.
H. Wanigatunga, for the petitioner.
A. F. Wijemanne, for the respondent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.