SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PIYADASA v. THE QUEEN


Piyadasa V. The Queen

1962 Present: Sansoni, J., and Sinnetamby, J.

G. PIYADASA, Appellant, and THE QUEEN, Respondent

 S. C . 109/1961-D. C. (Crim.) Hambantota, 40/28342

Indictment-Joinder of charges-Consolidation, in one indictment, of offences inquired into in separate non-summary proceedings-Illegality-Criminal Procedure Code, ss. 165F, 185F (1A), 425.

It is illegal for the Crown to join in one indictment charges which formed the subject of separate non-summary proceedings terminating in separate commitments.

Three separate non-summary inquiries were held against the same accused person in respect of three cases of cheating. In each of the three cases the Magistrate committed the accused to stand his trial in the District Court, but the Attorney-General drew up one indictment containing the counts inquired into in the three cases.

Held, that the indictment was not valid and the District Judge had no jurisdiction to try the accused on it. In such a case, the error strikes at the root of jurisdiction and cannot, therefore, be cured under section 425 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

                              The King v. Michael Fernando (1951) 52 N. L.























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top