PIYADASA v. THE QUEEN
1962 Present: Sansoni, J., and
Sinnetamby, J.
G. PIYADASA, Appellant, and THE QUEEN, Respondent
S. C . 109/1961-D. C. (Crim.) Hambantota, 40/28342
Indictment-Joinder of
charges-Consolidation, in one indictment, of offences inquired into in separate
non-summary proceedings-Illegality-Criminal Procedure Code, ss. 165F, 185F (1A),
425.
It is illegal for the Crown to join in one indictment charges which formed the
subject of separate non-summary proceedings terminating in separate commitments.
Three separate non-summary inquiries were held against the same accused person
in respect of three cases of cheating. In each of the three cases the Magistrate
committed the accused to stand his trial in the District Court, but the
Attorney-General drew up one indictment containing the counts inquired into in
the three cases.
Held, that the indictment was not valid and the District Judge had no
jurisdiction to try the accused on it. In such a case, the error strikes at the
root of jurisdiction and cannot, therefore, be cured under section 425 of the
Criminal Procedure Code.
The King v. Michael Fernando (1951) 52 N. L.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.