[IN THE PRIVY COUNCIL]
VISCOUNT DILHORNE, HODSON, GUEST, UPJOHN, WILBERFORCE, JJ
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL – Appellant
Versus
A.E. REID – Respondent
[IN THE PRIVY COUNCIL]
1964 Present : Viscount Dilhorne, Lord Hodson, Lord
Guest, Lord Upjohn, and Lord Wilberforce
THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL, Appellant, and A. E. REID,
Respondent
PRIVY COUNCIL APPEAL NO. 18 or 1964
S. C. 15/1962-D. C. (Grim.) Colombo, 2O90 / N
Bigamy-Christian monogamous
marriage--Subsequent conversion of husband to Muslim faith-His right to contract
a polygamous marriage-Marriage Registration Ordinance, ss. 18, 19 (1), 35 (2),
64-Muslim Marriage and Divorce Act-Penal Code, s. 362 B.
In a country such as Ceylon, where there are many races and creeds and a number
of Marriage Ordinances and Acts, the inhabitants domiciled here have an inherent
right to change their religion and personal law and so to contract a valid
polygamous marriage. If such inherent right is to be abrogated it must be done
by statute.
The respondent contracted a marriage on 18th September 1933 under the Marriage
Registration Ordinance, according to Christian rites. On 13th June 1959 he and a
divorced woman were converted to the Muslim faith. A month later they were duly
married under the provisions of the Muslim Marriage and Divorce Act,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.