2024 Supreme(US)(ca10) 57
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
United States – Appellant
Versus
Manzano – Respondent
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 13, 2024
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. No. 23-6073
JULIAN MANZANO, a/k/a Julian Manzano, Jr., a/k/a Ju Man,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma (D.C. No. 5:22-CR-00176-JD-1) _________________________________
Kyle E. Wackenheim, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Defendant-Appellant.
Steven W. Creager, Assistant United States Attorney, Danielle M. Connolly, Assistant United States Attorney (Robert J. Troester, United States Attorney, with them on the brief), Office of the United States Attorney, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Plaintiff-Appellee. _________________________________
Before HOLMES, Chief Judge, and SEYMOUR, and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges. _________________________________
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge. _________________________________
Mr. Julian Manzano pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in
violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). During sentencing, the district court ruled that Mr. Appellate Case: 23-6073 Document: 010111093863 Date Filed: 08/13/2024 Page: 2
Manzano’s prior Oklahoma conviction for second-degree murder qualified as a “crime of
violence” under § 4B1.2(a)(2) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”)
and, accordingly, applied a higher base offense level. On appeal, Mr. Manzano challenges
that ruling. Because Oklahoma second-degree murder does not categorically match generic
“murder” under the Guidelines, we reverse.
I.
Just twenty-five days free after serving thirteen years in prison, on March 26, 2022,
Mr. Manzano was pulled over by Oklahoma City police while driving. After approaching
the vehicle, officers observed smoke and smelled the odor of burnt marijuana inside Mr.
Manzano’s car and they requested that he exit the vehicle. Mr. Manzano initially refused
but complied when backup officers subsequently arrived. Officers searched the vehicle and
discovered a .45 caliber pistol and ammunition. Mr. Manzano admitted that the pistol was
his and that he had owned it for approximately four months.
Because of a prior 2009 conviction for Oklahoma second-degree murder, Mr.
Manzano was indicted for, and pled guilty to, one count of being a felon in possession of a
firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).1 In anticipation of sentencing, the United
States Probation Office prepared a Presentence Investigation Report (“PSR”) to calculate
Mr. Manzano’s advisory guideline range. The PSR classified Mr. Manzano’s prior
1 Section 922(g)(1) prohibits “any person who has been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year . . . to ship or transport in interstate or foreign commerce, or possess in or affecting commerce, any firearm or ammunition; or to receive any firearm or ammunition which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.” 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).
2 Appellate Case: 23-6073 Document: 010111093863 Date Filed: 08/13/2024 Page: 3
Oklahoma second-degree murder conviction as a “crime of violence” under U.S.S.G.
§ 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) and, accordingly, recommended a base offense level of 20. See U.S.S.G.
§ 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) (raising a defendant’s base offense level from 12 to 20 if “the defendant
committed