SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(US)(ca10) 37

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
Harrison – Appellant
Versus
Envision Management Holding Inc. Board – Respondent



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 9, 2023

Christopher M. Wolpert FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court _________________________________

ROBERT HARRISON, on behalf of himself, the ENVISION MANAGEMENT HOLDING, INC. ESOP, and all other similarly situated individuals,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. No. 22-1098

ENVISION MANAGEMENT HOLDING, INC. BOARD OF DIRECTORS; ENVISION MANAGEMENT HOLDING, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMMITTEE; ARGENT TRUST COMPANY; DARREL CREPS, III; PAUL SHERWOOD; JEFF JONES; AARON RAMSAY; TANWEER KAHN,

Defendants - Appellants.

------------------------------

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; THE ESOP ASSOCIATION; SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; PUBLIC JUSTICE,

Amici Curiae. _________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado (D.C. No. 1:21-CV-00304-RMR-NYW) _________________________________ Appellate Case: 22-1098 Document: 010110810667 Date Filed: 02/09/2023 Page: 2

Barbara A. Smith, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, Denver, Colorado (Michael J. Hoffman, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, Denver, Colorado; and Lars C. Golumbic, William J. Delaney, and Paul J. Rinefierd, Groom Law Group, Washington, DC, with her on the briefs), appearing for Appellants.

John Stokes, Stris & Maher LLP, Los Angeles, California (Peter K. Stris and Rachana A. Pathak, Stris & Maher LLP, Los Angeles, California; and Michelle C. Yau, Kai H. Richter, Mary J. Bortscheller, and Ryan A. Wheeler, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, Washington, DC, with him on the brief), appearing for Appellees.

Brendan Ballard, Senior Trial Attorney, Plan Benefits Security Division (Seema Nanda, Solicitor of Labor, G. William Scott, Associate Solicitor for Plan Benefits Security, and Jeffrey M. Hahn, Counsel for Appellate and Special Litigation, with her on the brief), United States Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, Washington, DC, appearing for Amicus Curiae United States Secretary of Labor in support of Appellees.

Jennifer B. Dickey, United States Chamber Litigation Center, Washington, DC; Andrew J. Pincus, Archis A. Parasharami, Daniel E. Jones, and Eric A. White, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC; and Nancy G. Ross, Jed W. Glickstein, Mayer Brown LLP, Chicago, Illinois, filed an Amicus Curiae brief on behalf of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States in support of Appellants.

Richard J. Pearl, Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Chicago, Illinois, and Mark D. Taticchi, Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Philadelphia, PA, filed an Amicus Curiae brief on behalf of Esop Association in support of Appellants.

Jeffrey B. Dubner, Democracy Forward Foundation, Washington, DC, and Leah M. Nicholls, Public Justice, Washington, DC, filed an Amicus Curiae brief on behalf of Public Justice in support of Appellees. _________________________________

Before BACHARACH, BRISCOE, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _________________________________

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. _________________________________

Plaintiff Robert Harrison, a participant in a defined contribution retirement

plan established by his former employer, filed suit under the Employee Retirement

Income Security Act (ERISA) against the fiduciaries of the plan alleging that they

2 Appellate Case: 22-1098 Document: 010110810667 Date Filed: 02/09/2023 Page:

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top