COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
Laufer – Appellant
Versus
Looper – Respondent
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 5, 2022
Christopher M. Wolpert FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court _________________________________
DEBORAH LAUFER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. No. 21-1031
RANDALL J. LOOPER; CYNTHIA C. LOOPER, d/b/a Elk Run Inn,
Defendants - Appellees. _________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado (D.C. No. 1:20-CV-02475-NYW) _________________________________
Thomas B. Bacon, Thomas B. Bacon Law Office, Mount Dora, Florida, for Plaintiff- Appellant.
Stephen B. Rotter (Jennifer L. Gokenbach, with him on the brief), The Workplace Counsel, Denver, Colorado, for Defendant-Appellee. _________________________________
Before TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge, HARTZ, and MATHESON, Circuit Judges. _________________________________
MATHESON, Circuit Judge. _________________________________
Deborah Laufer is qualified as disabled under the Americans with Disabilities
Act (“ADA”) and is a self-described ADA “tester.” In that capacity, she visited the Appellate Case: 21-1031 Document: 010110627575 Date Filed: 01/05/2022 Page: 2
Elk Run Inn’s online reservation system (“ORS”) to determine whether it complied
with the ADA, though she has no intention to stay there.
Ms. Laufer sued Randall and Cynthia Looper, the owners of the Elk Run Inn,
alleging that the ORS lacked information about accessibility in violation of an ADA
regulation. The district court dismissed Ms. Laufer’s complaint without prejudice for
lack of Article III standing because she failed to allege that she had suffered a
concrete and particularized injury. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,
we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
A. ADA Title III
Title III of the ADA “generally prohibits public accommodations from
discriminating against individuals on the basis of disability.” Levorsen v.
Octapharma Plasma, Inc., 828 F.3d 1227, 1229 (10th Cir. 2016). It provides that
“[n]o individual shall be discriminated against on the basis of disability in the full
and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or
accommodations of any place of public accommodation by any person who owns,
leases (or leases to), or operates a place of public accommodation.” 42
U.S.C. § 12182(a).
The Department of Justice promulgated a regulation under Title III stating that
a place of public accommodation (“PPA”) operating a “place of lodging” shall, “with
respect to reservations made by any means,” “[i]dentify and describe accessible
features in the hotels and guest rooms offered through its reservations service in
2 Appellate Case: 21-1031 Document: 010110627575 Date Filed: 01/05/2022 Page: 3
enough detail to reasonably permit individuals with disabilities to assess
independently whether a given hotel or guest room meets his or her accessibility
needs.” 28 C.F.R. § 36.302(e)(1)(ii) (the “ORS Regulation”).
B. Ms. Laufer’s Allegations
Ms. Laufer, a resident of Pasco County, Florida, uses a wheelchair and
requires accommodations due to her disability. In her complaint, she described
herself as an “advocate of the rights of similarly situated disabled persons” and a
“‘tester’ for the purpose of asserting her civil rights and monitoring, ensuring, and
determining whether places of public accommodation and thei
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.