SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(US)(ca1) 67

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
SEC – Appellant
Versus
Sargent – Respondent


No. 22-1596

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

HENRY B. SARGENT,

Defendant, Appellee,

FREDERICK M. MINTZ; ALAN P. FRAADE; JOSEPH J. TOMASEK; PATRICK GIORDANO,

Defendants.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Richard G. Stearns, U.S. District Judge]

Before

Barron, Chief Judge, Lynch and Gelpí, Circuit Judges.

Paul G. Alvarez, Senior Appellate Counsel, with whom Dan M. Berkovitz, General Counsel, and Michael A. Conley, Solicitor, were on brief, for appellant.

Peter R. Ginsberg, with whom Christopher R. Neff and Moskowitz & Book LLP were on brief, for appellee.

April 18, 2023 BARRON, Chief Judge. A party to a civil jury trial has the right under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 48(c) to request that the district court individually poll each juror after the jury has retu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top