SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(US)(ca1) 172

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
Dor – Appellant
Versus
Garland – Respondent


No. 20-1694

JONALSON DOR,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND,* Attorney General,

Respondent.

PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS

Before

Thompson, Howard, and Gelpí, Circuit Judges.

Edward Crane, with whom Philip L. Torrey, Crimmigration Clinic, Harvard Law School, Shaiba Rather, Lena Melillo, and Katie Quigley, Law Student Advocates, Crimmigration Clinic, Harvard Law School, were on brief, for petitioner. Andrew B. Insenga, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, with whom Jeffrey B. Clark, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, and Matthew B. George, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, were on brief, for respondent.

* Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2), Attorney General Merrick B. Garland has been substituted for former Attorney General William P. Barr. August 19, 2022 THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. Petitioner, Jonalson Dor ("

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top