SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(US)(ca1) 123

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
Torruella, Thompson, Kayatta
Cullinane – Appellant
Versus
Uber Technologies Inc. – Respondent


No. 16-2023

RACHEL CULLINANE, JACQUELINE NÚÑEZ, ELIZABETH SCHAUL, and ROSS MCDONAGH, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]

Before

Torruella, Thompson, and Kayatta, Circuit Judges.

Matthew W.H. Wessler, with whom Matthew Spurlock, Gupta Wessler PLLC, John Roddy, Elizabeth Ryan, and Bailey & Glasser LLP were on brief, for appellants. S. Elaine McChesney, with whom Lawrence T. Stanley, Jr., Emma D. Hall, and Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP were on brief, for appellee. Jennifer D. Bennett, Public Justice, P.C., Jonathan D. Selbin, Jason L. Lichtman, Andrew R. Kaufman, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Jahan Sagafi, Paul W. Mollica, Outten & Golden LLP, Stuart Rossman, and National Consumer Law Center, on brief for amicu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top