2023 Supreme(US)(ca4) 111
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Webster Williams III – Appellant
Versus
Michael Carvajal – Respondent
PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6495
WEBSTER DOUGLAS WILLIAMS, III
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Defendant – Appellee.
------------------------------
ARC OF THE UNITED STATES; MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA; NATIONAL DISABILITY RIGHTS NETWORK
Amici Supporting Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge (5:20−ct−03189−FL)
Argued: January 24, 2023 Decided: March 29, 2023
Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and Max O. COGBURN, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western District of North Carolina, sitting by designation.
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Wilkinson wrote the opinion, in which Judge Diaz and Judge Cogburn joined. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6495 Doc: 42 Filed: 03/29/2023 Pg: 2 of 21
ARGUED: Jennifer A. Wedekind, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Holly Paxson Pratesi, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Daniel K. Siegel, Michele Delgado, ACLU OF NORTH CAROLINA LEGAL FOUNDATION, Raleigh, North Carolina; Kaitlin Banner, Jacqueline Kutnik-Bauder, Ashika Verriest, Margaret Hart, WASHINGTON LAWYERS’ COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS & URBAN AFFAIRS, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Michael F. Easley, Jr., United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Samuel Weiss, RIGHTS BEHIND BARS, Washington, D.C., for Amici Curiae.
2 USCA4 Appeal: 22-6495 Doc: 42 Filed: 03/29/2023 Pg: 3 of 21
WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:
Webster Williams, a federal inmate, sued Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff
alleging, inter alia, discrimination and retaliation under the Rehabilitation Act. The district
court dismissed the action for failure to exhaust available administrative remedies.
According to the court, the Prison Litigation Reform Act required Williams to exhaust both
the BOP’s Administrative Remedy Program and an additional remedy, particular to prison
discrimination claims, administered by the Department of Justice’s Director of Equal
Employment Opportunity. Williams appeals, arguing that he was only required to exhaust
the BOP’s Administrative Remedy Program under the Prison Litigation Reform Act.
Williams asserts in the alternative that the Department of Justice remedies were not
“available” to him. We disagree with both contentions and thus affirm the district court’s
dismissal without prejudice for failure to exhaust.
I.
A.
On February 28, 2019, Webster Williams was walking to his work assignment at
the Butner Federal Correctional Complex in North Carolina when he developed a strong
urge to urinate. Williams suffers from several medical conditions, including kidney
disease, and takes a diuretic that causes excessive urination. As Williams headed to the
restroom, an alarm was triggered elsewhere in the prison. BOP Unit Manager Willis
responded by heading to the restroom entrance and telling inmates to return to their cells.
Williams proceeded past Willis without addressing him and went into a stall.