COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
United States – Appellant
Versus
Jacob Ross – Respondent
PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-4054
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JACOB DAYLEN ROSS, a/ka/ Jake, a/ka/ Timneals207@gmail.com, a/k/a Jacobross292@gmail.com,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:20-cr-00064-MR-WCM-1)
Argued: March 22, 2023 Decided: June 30, 2023
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge Gregory wrote the opinion, in which Judge Diaz and Judge Thacker concurred.
ARGUED: Geoffrey Ryan Willis, DYSART WILLIS, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anthony Joseph Enright, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Christian E. Dysart, DYSART WILLIS, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Dena J. King, United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. USCA4 Appeal: 22-4054 Doc: 49 Filed: 06/30/2023 Pg: 2 of 20
GREGORY, Chief Judge:
Jacob Daylen Ross was convicted of producing and possessing child pornography
in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) and 18 U.S.C. § 2252A, respectively, and sentenced to
fifty-five years in prison. On appeal, Ross argues that the district court erred by identifying
him for a key government witness, Sosha Peters, after Peters was initially unable to make
the in-court identification herself. Ross also contends that his sentence was grossly
disproportionate to his offenses in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Finding no
reversible error, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
I.
A.
In June 2020, the McDowell County, North Carolina Sheriff’s Office (“MCSO”)
received a report from Sosha Peters, who claimed that Jacob Ross might be sexually
abusing children. Peters showed MCSO text messages she had exchanged with a phone
number she said belonged to Ross (the “2873 number”), which appeared to corroborate her
allegations. Based on that information, MCSO obtained a search warrant for the phone
records for the 2873 number. The responsive records showed that the number was
registered to Ross Skid Products. Ross’s parents owned that company, and Ross himself
worked there.
On June 24, officers conducted a traffic stop of Ross’s car based on an outstanding,
unrelated arrest warrant. Following the stop, Ross consented to a search of a cell phone in
his possession (the “8434 number”). MCSO discovered a photograph of a “very young”
2 USCA4 Appeal: 22-4054 Doc: 49 Filed: 06/30/2023 Pg: 3 of 20
girl’s genitalia on the phone. J.A. 116–17. MCSO then seized the phone and performed a
forensic extraction, which revealed several additional images of child pornography.
Pursuant to a search warrant, MCSO obtained the subscriber information for the 8434
number, which showed that this phone, like the 2873 number, was registered to Ross Skid
Products. MCSO also secured search warrants for three Google Mail accounts it had
discovered while searching the phone. 1 The records Google provided revealed that each
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.