SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(US)(ca4) 138

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Teresa Speaks – Appellant
Versus
U. S. Tobacco Cooperative – Respondent



PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-2098

TERESA M. SPEAKS; TOBY SPEAKS; STANLEY SMITH; EDDIE BROWN; ROBERT POINDEXTER; MIKE MITCHELL; ROY L. COOK; ALEX SHUGART; H. RANDLE WOOD; ROBIN ROGERS; DANIEL LEE NELSON,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

U.S. TOBACCO COOPERATIVE, INC., f/k/a Flue-Cured Tobacco Cooperative Stabilization Corporation,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:12-cv-00729-D)

Argued: March 10, 2022 Decided: April 19, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Quattlebaum wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge Gregory and Judge Thacker joined.

ARGUED: Gary K. Shipman, SHIPMAN & WRIGHT, LLP, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellants. Lee Michael Whitman, WYRICK ROBBINS YATES & PONTON LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: William G. Wright, Sr., SHIPMAN & WRIGHT, LLP, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellants. Benjamin N. Thompson, Paul J. Puryear, Jr., WYRICK ROBBINS YATES & PONTON LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. USCA4 Appeal: 20-2098 Doc: 59 Filed: 04/19/2022 Pg: 2 of 11

QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judge:

The U.S. Tobacco Cooperative and its members have been embroiled in litigation

for over a decade. This appeal is their second trip to the Fourth Circuit. Previously, we

reversed a class settlement and remanded the case for further proceedings. Sharp Farms v.

Speaks, 917 F.3d 276 (4th Cir. 2019). The members then amended their complaint and now

seek judicial dissolution of the Cooperative. They claim dissolution is necessary because,

due to a variety of market forces facing the tobacco industry, the Cooperative is no longer

able to carry out its purposes. The district court dismissed the amended complaint, holding

that the ground for dissolution the members asserted—failure to carry out the

Cooperative’s purposes—did not apply as a matter of law. For the reasons that follow, we

affirm.

I.

The U.S. Tobacco Cooperative is an agricultural cooperative of flue-cured tobacco

farmers in North Carolina. Our dispute involves the Cooperative’s “administ[ration of] a

federal price-support program designed to stabilize tobacco prices for member growers

through purchasing their unsold tobacco at a guaranteed minimum price and marketing the

tobacco to buyers.” Id. at 280. Congress later ended the price-support program. But the

Cooperative accumulated and still maintains millions of dollars in reserves obtained from

member fees and from sales of tobacco delivered by members.

Certain members of the Cooperative seek dissolution of the Cooperative and

distribution of its reserves. They claim that “the Cooperative is no longer fulfilling the

2 USCA4 Appeal: 20-2098 Doc: 59 Filed: 04/19/2022 Pg: 3 of 11

mandates under which it was created” and “is no longer able to carry out its purpose.” J.A.

153. The members do not blame the Cooperative for this situation. Instead, they allege a

host of economic challenges facing the United States flue-cured tobacco industry and the

related farmers. Among those challenges

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top