2022 Supreme(US)(ca4) 138
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Teresa Speaks – Appellant
Versus
U. S. Tobacco Cooperative – Respondent
PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-2098
TERESA M. SPEAKS; TOBY SPEAKS; STANLEY SMITH; EDDIE BROWN; ROBERT POINDEXTER; MIKE MITCHELL; ROY L. COOK; ALEX SHUGART; H. RANDLE WOOD; ROBIN ROGERS; DANIEL LEE NELSON,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
U.S. TOBACCO COOPERATIVE, INC., f/k/a Flue-Cured Tobacco Cooperative Stabilization Corporation,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:12-cv-00729-D)
Argued: March 10, 2022 Decided: April 19, 2022
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Quattlebaum wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge Gregory and Judge Thacker joined.
ARGUED: Gary K. Shipman, SHIPMAN & WRIGHT, LLP, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellants. Lee Michael Whitman, WYRICK ROBBINS YATES & PONTON LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: William G. Wright, Sr., SHIPMAN & WRIGHT, LLP, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellants. Benjamin N. Thompson, Paul J. Puryear, Jr., WYRICK ROBBINS YATES & PONTON LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. USCA4 Appeal: 20-2098 Doc: 59 Filed: 04/19/2022 Pg: 2 of 11
QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judge:
The U.S. Tobacco Cooperative and its members have been embroiled in litigation
for over a decade. This appeal is their second trip to the Fourth Circuit. Previously, we
reversed a class settlement and remanded the case for further proceedings. Sharp Farms v.
Speaks, 917 F.3d 276 (4th Cir. 2019). The members then amended their complaint and now
seek judicial dissolution of the Cooperative. They claim dissolution is necessary because,
due to a variety of market forces facing the tobacco industry, the Cooperative is no longer
able to carry out its purposes. The district court dismissed the amended complaint, holding
that the ground for dissolution the members asserted—failure to carry out the
Cooperative’s purposes—did not apply as a matter of law. For the reasons that follow, we
affirm.
I.
The U.S. Tobacco Cooperative is an agricultural cooperative of flue-cured tobacco
farmers in North Carolina. Our dispute involves the Cooperative’s “administ[ration of] a
federal price-support program designed to stabilize tobacco prices for member growers
through purchasing their unsold tobacco at a guaranteed minimum price and marketing the
tobacco to buyers.” Id. at 280. Congress later ended the price-support program. But the
Cooperative accumulated and still maintains millions of dollars in reserves obtained from
member fees and from sales of tobacco delivered by members.
Certain members of the Cooperative seek dissolution of the Cooperative and
distribution of its reserves. They claim that “the Cooperative is no longer fulfilling the
2 USCA4 Appeal: 20-2098 Doc: 59 Filed: 04/19/2022 Pg: 3 of 11
mandates under which it was created” and “is no longer able to carry out its purpose.” J.A.
153. The members do not blame the Cooperative for this situation. Instead, they allege a
host of economic challenges facing the United States flue-cured tobacco industry and the
related farmers. Among those challenges