COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Martin Misjuns – Appellant
Versus
City of Lynchburg – Respondent
PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1782
MARTIN MISJUNS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CITY OF LYNCHBURG,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
LYNCHBURG FIRE DEPARTMENT; MARY JANE TOUSIGNANT DOLAN, in her official capacity; BEAU WRIGHT, in his official capacity; REID WODICKA, in his official capacity,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Robert S. Ballou, District Judge. (6:21-cv-00025-RSB-CKM)
Argued: March 20, 2025 Decided: June 5, 2025
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Gregory wrote the opinion, in which Judge Wilkinson and Judge Quattlebaum joined. Judge Wilkinson wrote a concurring opinion. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1782 Doc: 36 Filed: 06/05/2025 Pg: 2 of 18
ARGUED: Richard D. Boyer, INTEGRITY LAW FIRM, PLLC, Lynchburg, Virginia; James Fairchild, FAIRCHILD & YODER, PLLC, Forest, Virginia, for Appellant. Jennifer Royer, ROYER LAW FIRM, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
2 USCA4 Appeal: 24-1782 Doc: 36 Filed: 06/05/2025 Pg: 3 of 18
GREGORY, Circuit Judge:
This case concerns the firing of a Lynchburg Fire Department employee following
offensive social media posts attacking transgender individuals. After public outcry and an
internal investigation, the City of Lynchburg terminated Martin Misjuns from his position
as Fire Captain. Misjuns then brought suit against the City, alleging a mix of constitutional,
statutory, and common law claims. The district court dismissed all of Misjuns’ claims. On
review, we affirm the district court’s dismissal.
I.
Martin Misjuns was employed as a Fire Captain and paramedic by the City of
Lynchburg as part of the Lynchburg Fire Department (“LFD”). J.A. 3, 75. He was also a
union representative with IAFF Local 1146, the Lynchburg division of the International
Association of Fire Fighters labor union, and Ward I Chair for the Lynchburg Republican
City Committee. J.A. 3, 9.
Before the events that serve as the basis of this suit, there were already deep-seated
tensions between Misjuns and the City. For example, Misjuns alleged that LFD engaged
in “discriminatory training and promotion practices” against him in 2019 and 2020. J.A.
5. He also alleged politically-motivated actions. In spring 2020, IAFF Local 1146 and
Misjuns supported Republican candidates for Lynchburg City Council who ran against
candidates supported by the Democratic majority on City Council, including Defendants
Mayor Mary Dolan and Vice-Mayor Beau Wright. J.A. 3, 8–9. One of the Deputy Fire
Chiefs allegedly “began a pattern of harassing behavior” against Misjuns, including
3 USCA4 Appeal: 24-1782 Doc: 36 Filed: 06/05/2025 Pg: 4 of 18
sending him a text message that he did not approve of Local 1146’s post supporting the
Republican candidates. J.A. 9.
While this is important context, our case centers on Misjuns’ Facebook posts.
Misjuns maintained two Facebook pages: one, a personal page identifying him as “Marty
Misjuns”; the other, a public figure page, identifying him as “Martin J. Misjuns, Ward I
Chair - Lynchburg Republican City
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.