SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(US)(ca5) 5

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Chamber of Com of the USA – Appellant
Versus
SEC – Respondent



United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED December 19, 2023 No. 23-60255 Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk

Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America; Longview Chamber of Commerce; Texas Association of Business,

Petitioners,

versus

United States Securities and Exchange Commission,

Respondent. ______________________________

Petition for Review of an Order of the Securities and Exchange Commission Agency No. 34-97424 Agency No. IC-34906 Agency No. 88 Fed. Reg. 36002 ______________________________

Before Smith and Southwick, Circuit Judges. * Jerry E. Smith, Circuit Judge: The petitioners move this court to vacate the final rule. The time to respond or oppose has expired. We grant the motion and vacate the rule.

_____________________ * Judge Higginson, who was a member of the panel, now stands recused. This opin- ion is issued by a quorum. See 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). Case: 23-60255 Document: 00517007837 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/19/2023

No. 23-60255

On October 31, 2023, we issued an opinion on petitioners’ challenge to the rule of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) requiring issuers to report day-to-day share repurchase data once a quarter and to dis- close the reason why an issuer repurchased shares of its own stock. Chamber of Com. of the U.S. v. SEC, 85 F.4th 760 (5th Cir. 2023). We held that the SEC had acted arbitrarily and capriciously, in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), when it failed to respond to petitioners’ comments and failed to conduct a proper cost-benefit analysis. We therefore granted the petition for review, issued a “limited remand” directing the SEC “to correct the defects in the rule within 30 days,” and “retain[ed] jurisdiction to consider the decision . . . made on remand.” Id. On November 22, 2023—twenty-two days after the initial opinion issued—the SEC filed an opposed motion seeking to extend the thirty-day remand period for an indefinite time. In that motion, the agency explained it “ha[d] worked diligently to ascertain the steps necessary to comply with the Court’s remand order and ha[d] determined that doing so w[ould] require additional time.” We denied that motion on November 26, 2023. The thirty-day remand period expired on November 30, 2023. One day later, at the request of the Clerk of this court, the SEC filed a letter stating that “the Commission was not able to ‘correct the defects in the rule’ within 30 days of the [c]ourt’s opinion.”

I. Under the APA, this court must “set aside agency action[] found to be arbitrary [or] capricious, contrary to constitutional right, or without obser- vance of procedure as required by law.” Id. at 767–68 (citations omitted) (cleaned up). Accordingly, “

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top