COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Martinelli – Appellant
Versus
Hearst Newspapers – Respondent
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED April 13, 2023 No. 22-20333 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk
Antonio Martinelli,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Hearst Newspapers, L.L.C.; Hearst Magazine Media, Incorporated,
Defendants—Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:21-CV-3412
Before Barksdale, Southwick, and Higginson, Circuit Judges.
Stephen A. Higginson, Circuit Judge:
A civil action for copyright infringement under the Copyright Act of
1976 must be “commenced within three years after the claim accrued.” 17
U.S.C. § 507(b). In Graper v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co., our court decided
that this limitations period starts running “once the plaintiff knows or has
reason to know of the injury upon which the claim is based,” which is also
known as the discovery rule.
No. 22-20333
a holding that the clock starts when an act of copyright infringement occurs.
Hearst argues that Graper is no longer binding in light of the Supreme Court’s
decisions in Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.,
1 We adopt the parties’ spelling of the estate’s name, even though the more widely accepted spelling appears to be “Luggala.”
2 Case: 22-20333 Document: 00516711690 Page: 3 Date Filed: 04/13/2023
No. 22-20333
website. Hearst has stipu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.