COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Michigan First Credit Union – Appellant
Versus
T-Mobile USA Inc. – Respondent
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
┐ MICHIGAN FIRST CREDIT UNION, │ Plaintiff-Appellant, │ > No. 23-1952 │ v. │ │ T-MOBILE USA, INC., │ Defendant-Appellee. │ ┘
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit. No. 2:22-cv-13159—Jonathan J.C. Grey, District Judge.
Decided and Filed: July 16, 2024
Before: MOORE, COLE, and MATHIS, Circuit Judges. _________________
COUNSEL ON BRIEF: Charles J. Holzman, HOLZMAN LAW, PLLC, Southfield, Michigan, for Appellant. Robert D. Boley, ARENT FOX SCHIFF LLP, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Jennifer K. Chung, DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP, Seattle, Washington, James H. Moon, DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Appellee. _________________
OPINION _________________
MATHIS, Circuit Judge. The Electronic Fund Transfer Act (“EFTA”) requires banks, credit unions, and similar financial institutions to reimburse their customers for unauthorized electronic transfers of money from the customers’ accounts. Pursuant to its obligations under the EFTA, Michigan First Credit Union had to reimburse several of its customers for unauthorized electronic fund transfers who were subject to a cellphone scheme. Michigan First now seeks to recover those reimbursed funds from wireless cellular service provider T-Mobile USA, Inc. No. 23-1952 Mich. First Credit Union v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. Page 2
Specifically, Michigan First contends it is entitled to indemnification or contribution from T- Mobile. The district court dismissed Michigan First’s complaint, finding it failed to state a claim for indemnification or contribution under the EFTA or state law. We affirm.
I.
T-Mobile is a wireless telephone carrier with millions of subscribers. Each subscriber’s mobile device is given a subscriber identity module (“SIM”) card with a unique T-Mobile identifier. The SIM card ensures that calls, text messages, and other data are properly routed to the subscriber’s device.
A scam called “SIM Swap” has victimized some T-Mobile subscribers. A SIM Swap
occurs when: (1) a scammer contacts T-Mobile and falsely claims that a subscriber’s mobile
device was lost, damaged or stolen; (2) the scammer asks T-Mobile to activate a new SIM card
associated with the subscriber’s device—when the card is actually located in the scammer’s
device; (3) T-Mobile does not properly validate the request and unwittingly activates the new
SIM card, thereby giving the scammer access to the subscriber’s data; (4) the scammer takes
advantage of this by accessing the subscriber’s private information, including bank details; and
(5) the scammer uses these details to make unauthorized financial transactions. After
discovering the scam, T-Mobile subscribers often contact their banks to challenge the
unauthorized charges. Financial institutions subject to the EFTA must reimburse their customers
for unauthorized transactions regardless of fault, except in limited circumstances. 15 U.S.C.
§ 1693g; see also Merisier v. Bank of Am.,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.