SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(US)(ca6) 202

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
James B. Oswald Co. – Appellant
Versus
Dennis Neate – Respondent



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

┐ THE JAMES B. OSWALD COMPANY, a wholly owned │ subsidiary of JBO Holding Company; JBO HOLDING │ COMPANY, │ Plaintiffs-Appellees, > No. 23-3638 │ │ v. │ │ DENNIS NEATE; MICHAEL MAITLAND; ANNETTE │ BLANC; CHRISTINE PODLOGAR LOISELLE; HYLANT │ GROUP, INC., │ Defendants-Appellants. │ ┘

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland. No. 1:22-cv-01107—Charles E. Fleming, District Judge.

Argued: March 19, 2024

Decided and Filed: April 10, 2024

Before: GRIFFIN, NALBANDIAN, and MATHIS, Circuit Judges.

_________________

COUNSEL ARGUED: David Rodman Cooper, MARSHALL & MELHORN, LLC, Toledo, Ohio, for Appellants. Stephen S. Zashin, Ami J. Patel, ZASHIN & RICH CO., L.P.A., Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: David Rodman Cooper, MARSHALL & MELHORN, LLC, Toledo, Ohio, Michael A. Gonzalez, THE HEALTH LAW GROUP, LLC, Maumee, Ohio, for Appellants. Stephen S. Zashin, Ami J. Patel, ZASHIN & RICH CO., L.P.A., Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellees. No. 23-3638 James B. Oswald Co., et al. v. Neate, et al. Page 2

_________________

OPINION _________________

NALBANDIAN, Circuit Judge. When Dennis Neate left the James B. Oswald Company, an insurance firm, to go work for Hylant Group, Inc, another insurance firm, some of his clients left with him. Not happy about this, Oswald accused Neate of violating his non-solicitation agreement. So Oswald sued in federal district court and the court entered a preliminary injunction ordering Neate and others to comply in full with Oswald’s non-solicitation agreement. Neate appealed. For the following reasons, we VACATE and REMAND.

I.

Dennis Neate developed a substantial book of business over his sixteen years with the Hoffman Insurance Agency, where Neate was a part-owner of the company and an employee. When the James B. Oswald Company and its parent company, JBO Holding, bought Hoffman in 2016, Oswald hired Neate as its vice president market leader in the property and casualty business unit. Neate claims many of his Hoffman clients stayed with him even as he began working for Oswald. In connection with the sale of Hoffman, Neate signed a contract—known as the “Hoffman Agreement”—that contained noncompete provisions prohibiting Neate from competing with or soliciting customers away from Oswald. These provisions lasted five years from the date of the agreement.

Separately, in connection with his employment at Oswald, Neate and others had to sign a non-disclosure and non-solicitation agreement (NDNSA). Relevant here, the NDNSA’s Section 8 and 9 prohibited Oswald employees, for up to two years after the employees cease working for Oswald, from soliciting clients and employees away from the company. R.65, Order Granting Prelim. Inj., pp.11–12, PageID 1688–89 (sealed).

Problems bega

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top