2024 Supreme(US)(ca7) 121
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Sykes
Meghan Faxel – Appellant
Versus
Wilderness Hotel & Resort Inc – Respondent
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-1967 MEGHAN FAXEL and MIKE FAXEL, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v. WILDERNESS HOTEL & RESORT, INC., Defendant/ Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. PROSLIDE TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
Third-Party Defendant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. No. 19-cv-1026-slc — Stephen L. Crocker, Magistrate Judge. ____________________
ARGUED OCTOBER 25, 2022 — DECIDED AUGUST 15, 2024 ____________________
Before SYKES, Chief Judge, and FLAUM and LEE, Circuit Judges. 2 No. 21-1967
SYKES, Chief Judge. Meghan Faxel was injured while rid-
ing an inflatable tube down the “Black Hole,” a water slide
at the Wilderness Hotel in Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin. Her
tube became stuck and then flipped over, and she injured
her shoulder. Meghan and her husband, Mike Faxel, sued
Wilderness alleging claims for negligence, common-law
premises liability, and loss of consortium. Wilderness later
filed a cross-claim against ProSlide Technology, Inc., the
manufacturer of the slide, seeking contribution if found
liable.
The scheduling order set a deadline for the Faxels to dis-
close their liability expert, but the date came and went with
no disclosure. Almost three months later, they sought an
extension of time to name an expert. A magistrate judge,
presiding by consent, denied the motion. Wilderness then
moved for summary judgment, arguing that without expert
testimony, the Faxels could not prove their claims. The
magistrate judge agreed and entered judgment for Wilder-
ness.
We affirm. The hotel’s duty of care depends on what is
reasonably required of water-park operators regarding the
safety protocols, inspection, and maintenance of water slides
like this one. These questions require specialized knowledge
and expertise; they are not within the common knowledge of
jurors. It follows that without expert testimony, the Faxels
cannot prove their claims. Summary judgment for Wilder-
ness was appropriate.
I. Background
In August 2016 Meghan and Mike Faxel visited the “Wild
West” water park at the Wilderness Hotel & Golf Resort, one
No. 21-1967 3 of several indoor water parks at the resort’s vast recreational
complex in Wisconsin Dells. Meghan decided to try a water
slide called the “Black Hole,” a thrill ride in which the rider
sits on an inflatable tube and courses down a covered slide
that opens into a large bowl. Churning water then pushes
the rider in a circular motion into a final covered slide that
corkscrews into the exit pool. Aquatics attendants are posi-
tioned at the beginning and end of the ride to assist riders
and monitor for safety issues.
Meghan’s ride on the Black Hole did not proceed as
planned. When she emerged from the first slide into the
bowl section of the ride, the force of her descent and the
flowing water pushed her tube to the ridge (or side) of the
bowl instead of toward the opening to the second slide. Her
tube then became stuck in a “dry spot”—not literally a dry
spot but an area of the bowl where the water was not circu-
lating with sufficient force to continue pushing her along the
route. Her tube flipped over after stalling in this spot for a
few seconds, and Meghan sustained serious injury to her
collarbone and shoulder. She finished the ride without her
tube. When she landed in the exit pool, she told the at-
tendant that she was hurt; the attendant provided first aid,
and the park temp