SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(US)(ca7) 276

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Christian Arnold – Appellant
Versus
Martin J. O'Malley – Respondent


United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1305 CHRISTIAN S. ARNOLD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois. No. 20-cv-03344 — Sue E. Myerscough, Judge. ____________________

ARGUED NOVEMBER 15, 2023 — DECIDED JULY 1, 2024 ____________________

Before SYKES, Chief Judge, and BRENNAN, and LEE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. After a remand from the district court, an ad- ministrative law judge (ALJ) with the Social Security Admin- istration determined that Christian Arnold was disabled and entitled to past-due benefits. His law firm, Binder & Binder, then requested attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), point- ing to a contingency fee agreement Arnold had signed. Rather 2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top