SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(US)(ca7) 311

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Thermoflex Waukegan LLC – Appellant
Versus
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance USA Inc. – Respondent


Nos. 23-1521 & 23-1578 THERMOFLEX WAUKEGAN, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee,

v. MITSUI SUMITOMO INSURANCE USA, INC., Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant. ____________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 21 C 788 — John Z. Lee and Thomas M. Durkin, Judges. ____________________

ARGUED JANUARY 17, 2024 — DECIDED MAY 17, 2024 ____________________

Before FLAUM, EASTERBROOK, and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Thermoflex Waukegan re- quired hourly workers to use handprints to clock in and out. This led to a claim that doing so without workers’ wriXen con- sent, and using a third party to process the data, violated the Biometric Information Privacy Act, 740 ILCS 14/1 to 14/20 (BIPA or the Act). Thermoflex had multiple insurance policies in force during the years in question, including three from Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance. We call these the Basic, Excess, 2 Nos. 23-1521 & 23

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top