COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
United States – Appellant
Versus
Thomas Osadzinski – Respondent
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-3140 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THOMAS OSADZINSKI, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 1:19-cr-00869-1 — Robert W. Gettleman, Judge. ____________________
ARGUED JANUARY 8, 2024 — DECIDED MARCH 28, 2024 ____________________
Before WOOD, SCUDDER, and ST. EVE, Circuit Judges.
SCUDDER, Circuit Judge. Thomas Osadzinski appeals his
conviction for providing material support to a terrorist organ-
ization. In 2019 he created a computer program that allowed
ISIS (the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria) and its followers to
rapidly duplicate terrorist propaganda videos online and
thereby to stay a step ahead of efforts by the United States and
other western governments to thwart the organization’s me-
dia campaign. Osadzinski shared his computer program with
2 No. 22-3140 people he believed were ISIS supporters, taught them how to
use it, and deployed it to compile and disseminate a large
trove of ISIS media.
Osadzinski claims that his conviction violated the First
Amendment because his actions constituted independent free
expression. Alternatively, he contends that he lacked fair
notice that his offense conduct violated the material-support
statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2339B. He further argues that the evidence
the government presented at his trial was insufficient to sup-
port his conviction. We disagree on all fronts. Applying the
guidance the Supreme Court supplied in Holder v.
Humanitarian Law Project,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.