SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(US)(ca7) 433

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
LKQ Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Robert Rutledge – Respondent


United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2330 LKQ CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. ROBERT RUTLEDGE, Defendant/Counter-Claimant-Appellee. ____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 1:21-cv-03022 — Thomas M. Durkin, Judge. ____________________

ARGUED FEBRUARY 14, 2024 — DECIDED MARCH 15, 2024 ____________________

Before SCUDDER, ST. EVE, and LEE, Circuit Judges. SCUDDER, Circuit Judge. This case presents a complicated and important issue of Delaware law: whether, and in what circumstances, contractual provisions requiring a corpora- tion’s former employees to forfeit a monetary benefit upon leaving the firm and joining a competitor—so-called forfei- ture-for-competition provisions—are subject to review for reasonableness. Robert Rutledge agreed to such a provision as part of his participation in LKQ Corporation’s restricted

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top