SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(US)(ca7) 164

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Easterbrook
Next Technologies Inc. – Appellant
Versus
Beyond the Office Door LLC – Respondent


United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-2169 NEXT TECHNOLOGIES INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. BEYOND THE OFFICE DOOR, LLC (doing business as BTOD.com), Defendant-Appellee. ____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. No. 19-cv-217-wmc — William M. Conley, Judge. ____________________

ARGUED JANUARY 12, 2021 — DECIDED MARCH 24, 2021 ____________________

Before EASTERBROOK, WOOD, and ST. EVE, Circuit Judges. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Does the Constitution of the United States tell us the limits of criticism in reviews of standing desks? The district judge thought that it does, treated the plaintiff (a seller of office products) as a “limited purpose public figure,” and ruled in favor of the reviewer— which sells a competing line of standing desks—under the First Amendment. 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102413 (W.D. Wis. 2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top