SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(US)(ca7) 325

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Wood dissents
Planned Parenthood of Indiana – Appellant
Versus
Marion County Prosecutor – Respondent


United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-2407 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. No. 1:18-cv-01219 — Richard L. Young, Judge. ____________________

ARGUED JANUARY 12, 2021 — DECIDED AUGUST 2, 2021 ____________________

Before EASTERBROOK, WOOD, and ST. EVE, Circuit Judges. ST. EVE, Circuit Judge. This appeal queries whether an In- diana statute that requires medical providers to report com- plications “arising from” abortions to the state is unconstitu- tionally vague on its face. Although the statute has some am- biguity, we conclude that Planned Parenthood has not shown that the law is unconstitutionally vague on its face in this pre- enforcement challenge. 2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top