SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(US)(ca9) 35

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. – Appellant
Versus
Mitchell – Respondent


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OPPENHEIMER & CO. INC., No. 24-2379 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:23-cv-00067- MJP v. STEVEN MITCHELL; DORI OPINION MITCHELL; JEROME HOPPER; LORI HOPPER,

Defendants - Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Marsha J. Pechman, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted April 1, 2025 Pasadena, California Filed April 24, 2025 Before: MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and LAWRENCE VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and JANE MAGNUS- STINSON, District Judge. * Opinion by Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr.

* The Honorable Jane Magnus-Stinson, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Indiana, sitting by designation. 2 OPPENHEIMER & CO. INC. V. MITCHELL

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top