SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(US)(ca9) 106

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Magana-Magana – Appellant
Versus
Bondi – Respondent


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LUCILA MAGANA-MAGANA, No. 23-1887 Agency No. Petitioner, A098-918-838 v. ORDER AND PAMELA BONDI*, Attorney AMENDED General, OPINION

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 24, 2024 ** Phoenix, Arizona

Filed December 26, 2024 Amended February 19, 2025 Before: MILAN D. SMITH, JR., BRIDGET S. BADE, and DANIELLE J. FORREST, Circuit Judges. * We have substituted Attorney General Pamela Bondi as defendant- appellee pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c). ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2 MAGANA-MAGANA V. BONDI

Order; Op

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top