SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(US)(ca9) 149

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Project Veritas – Appellant
Versus
Michael Schmidt – Respondent


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PROJECT VERITAS; PROJECT No. 22-35271 VERITAS ACTION FUND, D.C. No. 3:20-cv- Plaintiffs-Appellants, 01435-MO

v. OPINION MICHAEL SCHMIDT, in his official capacity as Multnomah County District Attorney; ELLEN ROSENBLUM, in her official capacity as Oregon Attorney General,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted En Banc June 25, 2024 Seattle, Washington

Filed January 7, 2025 Before: Mary H. Murguia, Chief Judge, and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Morgan Christen, Mark J. Bennett, Daniel P. Collins, Kenneth K. Lee, Jennifer Sung, Gabriel P. 2 PROJECT VERITAS V. SCHMIDT

Sanchez, Roopali H. Desai, Anthony D. Johnstone and Ana de Alba, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Christen; Concurrence by Judge Bennett; Dissent by Judg

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top