SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(US)(ca9) 9

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Magana-Magana – Appellant
Versus
Garland – Respondent


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LUCILA MAGANA-MAGANA, No. 23-1887 Agency No. Petitioner, A098-918-838 v. OPINION MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 24, 2024 * Phoenix, Arizona

Filed December 26, 2024 Before: MILAN D. SMITH, JR., BRIDGET S. BADE, and DANIELLE J. FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr.

* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2 MAGANA-MAGANA V. GARLAND

SUMMARY **

Immigration

Denying in part and dismissing in part Lucila Magana- Magana’s petition for review a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, the panel held that the court has jurisdiction t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top