SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(US)(ca9) 92

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Chad Lee – Appellant
Versus
Ryan Thornell – Respondent


Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:01-CV-02178-EHC District of Arizona, v. Phoenix RYAN THORNELL, ORDER

Respondent-Appellee. Before: CALLAHAN, NGUYEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

The opinion filed on June 11, 2024, and appearing at 104 F.4th 120 is amended as follows. At Slip Op. page 33, line 18 [104 F.4th at 138], remove “see also Jones, 2024 WL 2751215, at *9 (noting that the Arizona Supreme Court has apparently never ‘vacated the judgment of death in a case involving multiple murders—let alone a case involving all of the aggravating circumstances present here’).”

With this amendment, the panel unanimously voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing, Dkt. No. 160, is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing will be entertained. FOR PUBLICATION

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top