SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(US)(ca9) 127

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jesus Pimentel – Appellant
Versus
City of Los Angeles – Respondent


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JESUS PIMENTEL; DAVID R. No. 22-55946 WELCH; JEFFREY O'CONNELL; EDWARD LEE; WENDY COOPER; D.C. No. JACKLYN BAIRD; RAFAEL 2:14-cv-01371- BUELNA, and all persons similarly FMO-E situated,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, OPINION and ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff,

v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES,

Defendant-Appellee,

v. ELEN KARAPETYAN,

Movant. 2 PIMENTEL V. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando M. Olguin, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 25, 2024 Pasadena, California

Filed September 9, 2024

Before: Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Mark J. Bennett, and Kenneth K. Lee, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Lee; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Bennett

SUMMARY *

Excessive Fines Clause

The panel reversed the district court’s summary judgment for the City

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top