SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(US)(ca9) 453

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jane Doe – Appellant
Versus
Daniel Fitzgerald – Respondent


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JANE DOE, Nos. 1-10, No. 22-56216

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-10713- v. MWF-RAO DANIEL S. FITZGERALD, OPINION Defendant-Appellant, US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK,

Real-party-in-interest- Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 29, 2024 Pasadena, California

Filed May 24, 2024 2 DOE V. FITZGERALD

Before: Ronald M. Gould, Sandra S. Ikuta, and Danielle J. Forrest, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Ikuta

SUMMARY *

Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act

The panel affirmed the district court’s order staying proceedings in an action under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act pending the r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top