SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(US)(ca9) 153

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Chicken Ranch Rancheria – Appellant
Versus
State of California – Respondent


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHICKEN RANCH RANCHERIA No. 21-15751 OF ME-WUK INDIANS; CHEMEHUEVI INDIAN TRIBE; D.C. No. BLUE LAKE RANCHERIA; 1:19-cv-00024- HOPLAND BAND OF POMO AWI-SKO INDIANS; ROBINSON RANCHERIA, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION

v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA; GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of California, Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 16, 2023 San Francisco, California Filed April 25, 2023 Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Daniel A. Bress, and Patrick J. Bumatay, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Bress 2 CHICKEN RANCH RANCHERIA V. STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUMMARY *

Attorneys’ Fees

The panel denied a request for attorneys’ fees by Indian Tribes that prevailed in their lawsuit against the State of California under the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top