SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(US)(ca9) 172

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
United States – Appellant
Versus
David Williams – Respondent


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-10174

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 4:18-cr-01695- JAS-EJM-1 DAVID KAPONE WILLIAMS; MARCELL DEMETRIUS GRAY; SHAWMAINE EUSTACE ARDELL OPINION MOORE; SAMUEL LEE BERRELLE RAKESTRAW III; MICHAEL ANTHONY WILLIAMS; KEANA NICOLE IWANKIW; CLIFFTON MARTINEZ; JERMAINE LAMAR MAXWELL; REGINALD COLE JOHNSON; TROY JERMAINE HOWELL; MARK ANTHONY HOLGUIN; TENELL MICHAEL MURE; LABARR MARTINEZ; DAVID GOROSAVE; BUFFIE ANN BRIDGES; DEZIRAE ALEXANDRIA MONTEEN,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James Alan Soto, District Judge, Presiding 2 UNITED STATES V. WILLIAMS

Argued and Submitted December 7, 2022 Phoenix, Arizona

Filed May 18, 2023

Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw and Patrick J. Bumatay, Circuit Judges, and Jack Zouhary, * District Judge.

Opinion by Judge Bumatay

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top