SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(US)(ca9) 239

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Kirstin Johnson – Appellant
Versus
Kierstie Barr – Respondent


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KIRSTIN JOHNSON; F.M.; M.D.M.; No. 21-16547 M.P.M.; V.M.; T.M., D.C. No. 3:20- Plaintiffs-Appellants, cv-01569-SK

v. OPINION KIERSTIE BARR; SAMSON HUNG; MARINA CHACON; FLINT PAUL; CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Sallie Kim, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 24, 2023 San Francisco, California

Filed July 6, 2023

Before: Ronald M. Gould, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, and Daniel A. Bress, Circuit Judges. 2 JOHNSON V. BARR

Opinion by Judge Gould; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Rawlinson

SUMMARY *

Civil Rights / Qualified Immunity

In an action brought by Kirstin Johnson and her five minor children alleging federal and state law claims arising out of Johnson’s arrest, the p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top