SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(US)(ca9) 359

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Miranda Wallingford – Appellant
Versus
Robert Bonta – Respondent


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MIRANDA WALLINGFORD; No. 21-56292 RICHARD WALLINGFORD, Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 8:21-cv-01412- v. DOC-KES ROBERT ANDRES BONTA, Esquire, in his official capacity as OPINION Attorney General of the State of California, Defendant-Appellee, and DOES, 1-10, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 15, 2022 Pasadena, California

Filed September 21, 2023 2 WALLINGFORD V. BONTA

Before: Mark J. Bennett and Daniel P. Collins, Circuit Judges, and Elizabeth E. Foote,* District Judge.

Opinion by Judge Bennett; Dissent by Judge Collins

SUMMARY**

Mootness

The panel dismissed as moot an action asserting an as- applied challenge to California laws

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top