SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(US)(ca9) 389

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Danielle Martinez – Appellant
Versus
Gavin Newsom – Respondent


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Danielle Howard Martinez; D. P., a No. 20-56404 minor, by his Guardian ad Litem Erica Wedlow; K. P., a minor, by his D.C. No. Guardian ad Litem Brittany 5:20-cv-01796- Williams; T. W., a minor by his SVW-AFM Guardian ad Litem Dahl Johnson; P. C., a minor by her Guardian ad Litem Raven Campbell; LASHONDA OPINION HUBBARD; AMBER WOOD, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor; STATE OF CALIFORNIA; CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION; CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH; CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; SANDRA SHEWRY, State Public Health Officer and Department of Public Health Director; CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; TONY THURMOND, State Superintendent of Public Education; CALIFORNIA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF, Fremont and Riverside; CALIFORNIA SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND DIAGNOSTIC CENTER, Northern California, Central California 2 MARTINEZ V. NEWSOM

Southern California; FREMONT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; MT. DIABLO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; SAN RAMON VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; WEST CONTR

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top