SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(US)(ca9) 236

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Zane Dickinson – Appellant
Versus
David Shinn – Respondent


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ZANE DICKINSON, No. 20-15175 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:18-cv-08037- MTL DAVID SHINN, Director; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA, OPINION Respondents-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 19, 2020 Phoenix, Arizona

Filed June 22, 2021

Before: Richard C. Tallman, Jay S. Bybee, and Bridget S. Bade, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Bade 2 DICKINSON V. SHINN

SUMMARY *

Habeas Corpus

The panel affirmed the district court’s denial of Zane Dickinson’s habeas corpus petition challenging his Arizona state court conviction for attempted second-degree murder in a case in which the trial court misstated Arizona law in its ins

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top