SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(US)(ca9) 340

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
United States – Appellant
Versus
Ricardo Rizo-Rizo – Respondent


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF No. 20-50172 AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:20-mj-20210-BMK-H-1 v. 3:20-mj-20210-BMK-H RICARDO RIZO-RIZO, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted August 3, 2021 Pasadena, California

Filed October 29, 2021

Before: Richard A. Paez, Consuelo M. Callahan, and Mark J. Bennett, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Bennett 2 UNITED STATES V. RIZO-RIZO

SUMMARY *

Criminal

Affirming a conviction for attempted illegal entry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(1), the panel held that § 1325(a) is a regulatory offense such that the presumption in favor of scienter does not apply, and thus knowledge of alienage is not an element.

COUNSEL Doug Keller (argued) and Michae

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top