SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(US)(ca9) 347

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Inland Empire Waterkeeper – Appellant
Versus
Corona Clay Co. – Respondent


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

INLAND EMPIRE WATERKEEPER, a Nos. 20-55420 project of Orange County 20-55678 Coastkeeper; ORANGE COUNTY COASTKEEPER, a California non- D.C. No. profit corporation, 8:18-cv-00333- Plaintiffs-Appellants/ DOC-DFM Cross-Appellees,

v. ORDER AND AMENDED CORONA CLAY CO., a California OPINION Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 4, 2021 Pasadena, California

Filed September 20, 2021 Amended November 5, 2021 2 INLAND EMPIRE WATERKEEPER V. CORONA CLAY

Before: Eugene E. Siler, * Andrew D. Hurwitz, and Daniel P. Collins, Circuit Judges.

Order; Opinion by Judge Hurwitz;

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top