SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(US)(ca9) 411

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Edmond Carmona – Appellant
Versus
Domino's Pizza LLC – Respondent


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDMOND CARMONA, No. 21-55009 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. and 8:20-cv-01905- JVS-JDE ABRAHAM MENDOZA; ROGER NOGUERIA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, OPINION Plaintiffs,

v. DOMINO’S PIZZA, LLC, a Michigan Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 15, 2021 Pasadena, California

Filed December 23, 2021 2 CARMONA V. DOMINO’S PIZZA

Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Barrington D. Parker, * and Andrew D. Hurwitz, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Hurwitz

SUMMARY **

Federal Arbitration Act / California Labor Law

The panel affirmed the district court’s order denying Domino’s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top