SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(US)(ca9) 43

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Parents for Privacy – Appellant
Versus
William Barr – Respondent


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PARENTS FOR PRIVACY; JON GOLLY; No.18-35708 KRIS GOLLY, individually and as guardians ad litem for A.G.; NICOLE D.C. No. LILLIE; MELISSA GREGORY, CV 17-1813 HZ individually and as guardian ad litem for T.F.; PARENTS RIGHTS IN EDUCATION, an Oregon nonprofit OPINION corporation; LINDSAY GOLLY, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General; BETSY DEVOS; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; DALLAS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2, Defendants-Appellees, BASIC RIGHTS OREGON, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Marco A. Hernández, District Judge, Presiding 2 PARENTS FOR PRIVACY V. BARR

Argued and Submitted July 11, 2019 Portland, Oregon

Filed February 12, 2020

Before: A. Wallace Tashima, Susan P. Graber, and John B. Owens, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Tashima

SUM

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top