SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(US)(ca9) 166

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Rodney Woodland – Appellant
Versus
Montero Hill – Respondent


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RODNEY WOODLAND, No. 23-55418

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-03930- v. AB-MRW MONTERO LAMAR HILL, AKA Lil Nas X; DOES, 1-10, Inclusive, OPINION

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Andre Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 13, 2025 Pasadena, California

Filed May 16, 2025 Before: Ronald M. Gould, Mark J. Bennett, and Kenneth K. Lee, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Lee 2 WOODLAND V. HILL

SUMMARY *

Copyright

The panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal of an action for copyright infringement brought by Rodney Woodland against Montero Lamar Hill. Woodland alleged that Hill, also known as Lil Nas X, posted photos of himself on his Instagram page that were too similar to photos on Woo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top