SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(US)(ca9) 254

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Miguel Orellana – Appellant
Versus
William Barr – Respondent


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIGUEL ANGEL ORELLANA, No. 19-70164 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A072-937-494

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. OPINION

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 6, 2020 * Pasadena, California

Filed July 28, 2020

Before: MILAN D. SMITH, JR., JOHN B. OWENS, and DANIEL A. BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr.; Concurrence by Judge Owens

* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2 ORELLANA V. BARR

SUMMARY **

Immigration

Denying Miguel Orellana’s petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, the panel held that 1) a conviction for crimin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top