SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(US)(ca9) 169

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Winston Anderson – Appellant
Versus
Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee – Respondent


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WINSTON R. ANDERSON; No. 22-16268 CHRISTOPHER M. SULYMA, and all others similarly situated, D.C. Nos. 3:19-cv-04618- Plaintiffs-Appellants, VC 3:15-cv-04977- v. VC 5:16-cv-00522- INTEL CORPORATION LHK INVESTMENT POLICY COMMITTEE; INTEL RETIREMENT PLANS ADMINISTRATIVE OPINION COMMITTEE; FINANCE COMMITTEE OF THE INTEL CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS; CHRISTOPHER C. GECZY; RAVI JACOB; DAVID S. POTTRUCK; ARVIND SODHANI; RICHARD TAYLOR; TERRA CASTALDI; RONALD D. DICKEL; TIFFANY DOON SILVA; TAMI GRAHAM; CARY KLAFTER; STUART ODELL; CHARLENE BARSHEFSKY; SUSAN L. DECKER; JOHN J. DONAHOE; REED HUNDT; JAMES D. PLUMMER; FRANK D. YEARY; STACY SMITH; ROBERT H. SWAN; TODD UNDERWOOD; 2 ANDERSON V. INTEL CORP. INV. POLICY COMM.

GEORGE S. DAVIS,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Vinc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top