COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Winston Anderson – Appellant
Versus
Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee – Respondent
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WINSTON R. ANDERSON; No. 22-16268 CHRISTOPHER M. SULYMA, and all others similarly situated, D.C. Nos. 3:19-cv-04618- Plaintiffs-Appellants, VC 3:15-cv-04977- v. VC 5:16-cv-00522- INTEL CORPORATION LHK INVESTMENT POLICY COMMITTEE; INTEL RETIREMENT PLANS ADMINISTRATIVE OPINION COMMITTEE; FINANCE COMMITTEE OF THE INTEL CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS; CHRISTOPHER C. GECZY; RAVI JACOB; DAVID S. POTTRUCK; ARVIND SODHANI; RICHARD TAYLOR; TERRA CASTALDI; RONALD D. DICKEL; TIFFANY DOON SILVA; TAMI GRAHAM; CARY KLAFTER; STUART ODELL; CHARLENE BARSHEFSKY; SUSAN L. DECKER; JOHN J. DONAHOE; REED HUNDT; JAMES D. PLUMMER; FRANK D. YEARY; STACY SMITH; ROBERT H. SWAN; TODD UNDERWOOD; 2 ANDERSON V. INTEL CORP. INV. POLICY COMM.
GEORGE S. DAVIS,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Vinc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.