SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(US)(ca9) 188

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jingshan Li – Appellant
Versus
Pamela Bondi – Respondent


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JINGSHAN LI, No. 18-70278

Petitioner, Agency No. A077-094-679 v. PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, OPINION

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted October 17, 2023 Pasadena, California

Filed June 10, 2025

Before: A. Wallace Tashima, Daniel P. Collins, and Gabriel P. Sanchez, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Sanchez; Dissent by Judge Collins 2 LI V. BONDI

SUMMARY*

Immigration

Granting Jingshan Li’s petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying his motion to reopen, the panel concluded that the Board abused its discretion by failing to offer a reasoned explanation for its determination that it cannot or should not review claims of ineffective assistance of counsel before a different tribunal, and remanded. In

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top