SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(US)(ca9) 86

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Beezer, Tallman, Bybee
United States – Appellant
Versus
Battershell – Respondent


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 05-30397 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. CR-04-05525-FDB JOEL BATTERSHELL, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Franklin D. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 5, 2006—Seattle, Washington

Filed August 10, 2006

Before: Robert R. Beezer, Richard C. Tallman, and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Tallman

9259 9262 UNITED STATES v. BATTERSHELL

COUNSEL Colin Fieman, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Tacoma, Washington, for the defendant-appellant. John McKay, United States Attorney, Seattle, Washington, for the plaintiff-appellee. UNITED STATES v. BATTERSHELL 9263 OPINION TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:

We are ask

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top